HE same kind of wheels as those before written are also made in rivers. Around their
fronts are affixed pinnae (4), which, when impelled by the current of the
Fig. LXXXIV.
river, force the wheel to revolve; and the buckets thus drawing up the water,
discharge it at the top, without the operation of walking; the impulse of the river itself per-
forming the whole work.
By the same means also the hydraulae are turned; in which all the parts are the same, ex¬
cept that on one end of the axis they have a toothed tympanum (B) included,
Fig. LXXXIV
which, by being set perpendicularly on the edge, is turned equally with the
wheel (C). Adjoining this tympanum a larger one (D), also toothed, is placed horizontally;
(1*) Hydraulae is altered by Salmasius to hydromylae,
water mills ; the former word may however have been
used by the Romans, as the common name of all machines
moved by water.
(2*) Tympanum dentatum & inclusum.—Perrault objects
to this phrase, as expressing that the tympanum was in¬
cluded within the axis, instead of the latter being included
in the former: but it is evident Vitruvius means as he
has expressed it; for he uses the same expression again
in this chapter, and I imagine it is to be understood to
signify that the tympanum is included within the extent
of the length, not within the body, of the axis. The same
expression is again repeated at the 14th chapter following,
where it is evidently used in this sense.
(3*) The words are, in cultrum, on the knife; a mode
of expression used to signify the being situated on the side
or edge : and a coltello is at this day used by the Italians
in the same sense.
(4*) Secundum id tympanum majus item, &c.—Mqjus
(larger) is changed to minus (smaller) by Perrault and
Galiani; for, say they, * unless this last-mentioned tym-
panum was smaller than the former, the mill-stone which
was adjoined to it would move slower than the water
wheel, which may be too slow to answer the purpose, and
is contrary to the present practice."
B00 K . X.
CHAPTER X.
Of Wheels and Tympanums for grinding of Corn.
All the manuscripts that I have examined, as well as
the printed editions, agree in having majus, and not minus:
and we ought to be cautious of altering the text in pas-
sages where all the copies agree; the rather as the antient
mills may have differed from the modern ones in this
respect, and yet have performed their office as well. For,
although by such a construction the mill-stone would
be moved slower, it would however be moved easier,
as being moved by a longer lever ; or, if the water wheel
should have been smaller than ours, it would revolve
quicker, and thus cause the mill-stone to revolve as
quickly as ours does. Or, thirdly, if the mill-stone itself
should have been larger, its velocity at the circumference
may have been greater than that of a smaller mill-stone
whose revolutions were quicker, and also would have
contained a greater quantity of grain under action at the
same time; so that the intention might be as well exe¬
cuted by a mill of such a construction, as by those in pre¬
sent use. For these reasons it appears unnecessary to follow
the example of Perrault and Galiani in deviating from
the text.
Perrault has represented the mill-stone wheel as being
composed of spindles, instead of teeth, as Vitruvius de¬
scribes ; because, he says, they are so at present: as it it
were not possible for the antient mills to be made different
from those of the moderns.